The Planning Board's review of Mill Street Lofts has gone on for a year now, and surprisingly things were revealed about the project for the first time last night.
Possibly inspired by the questionably "affordable" rents at the soon-to-be completed Hudson Depot Lofts, Mill Street resident Lakia Walker asked about the affordability of the apartments in this project, noting that "affordable" was not the same as "low-income." The answer to her question had to be disappointing for those who advocated for the project by citing homeless people and those displaced by rising housing costs.
Sean Kearney described the building as "mixed income," for households at three income levels: up to 30 percent of the AMI (area median income), up to 60 percent of the AMI, and up to 100 percent of the AMI. The majority of the apartments (54) would be for households with incomes up to 60 percent of the AMI; 9 apartments would be reserved for households in the lower income band (30 percent AMI) and 7 for households in the higher income band (100 percent AMI). The size of the apartments was also revealed for the first time: 43 one-bedroom; 21 two-bedroom, and 6 three-bedroom. When asked how many apartments of each size were designated for each income band, Kearney said he would provide that information to the Planning Board.
Another issue that hadn't been discussed before was a drainage ditch or trench that is part of the plan to move water off the site. Planning Board member Veronica Concra, who voted against granting site plan approval, called the trench an attractive nuisance and said it was creating something of danger--a trench 24 feet wide and 6 feet deep filled with moving water. She called for visuals to show the trench, guardrails, and the sidewalk to which it is adjacent. There were also requests for some modeling to show the height of the buildings in the context of the terrain. Despite these requests and concerns, the vote on approving the project went forward.
As reported previously, the project was approved, by a vote of 4 to 2. Theresa Joyner, Randall Martin, Gene Shetsky, and Bettina Young all voted to approve the project. The two newest members of the Planning Board--Veronica Concra and Gabrielle Hoffmann--voted against it.
COPYRIGHT 2025 CAROLE OSTERINK